Arizona v. California 373 U.S. 546 (1963)

+ Arizona brought suit under the original jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1952 to resolve its dispute with California over rights to use the Lower Basin apportionment of the Colorado River Basin Compact.

+ Much to California's dismay, the Supreme Court held that by passing the Boulder Canyon Project Act, Congress had, in effect, apportioned the mainstem of the Colorado River with California receiving 4.4 million acre-feet, Arizona 2.8 million acre-feet, and Nevada 0.3 million acre-feet.

+ Furthermore, the Court found that the Boulder Canyon Project Act allowed Arizona and Nevada the exclusive use of their tributaries, which did not support the Upper Basin states' position that the Mexican Treaty obligation should be satisfied from flows in the Lower Basin in excess of their apportionment, much of which was intended to come from Lower Basin tributaries.

+ Back to Home | + Back to Interstate Compacts